Character, Dignity, and Self-Respect Essay

This paper will sum up the film Glory and relate a couple of characters to Aristotle, Epictetus, and Saint Augustine on character, pride, and sense of pride. Alina Campbell This paper will sum up the film Glory and relate a couple of characters to Aristotle, Epictetus, and Saint Augustine on character, pride, and confidence. The film Glory depends on a genuine tale about the Commander of the 54th Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry which was the principal dark regiment to be recorded in the administration of the United States. It depends on the letters by Col. Robert Shaw. Col. Shaw felt he was associated with something that he was not totally sure about, considering he had recently lost a great deal of fighters to fight. He was presently confronted with survivor’s blame which he knew would recuperate in time. Shaw later turned into a powerful pioneer that lead the dark regiment to take on the fight in Fort Wagner. Aristotle Character is mental and moral characteristics particular to a person. Aristotle accepted character to be neither an inclination or a limit or a unimportant propensity to act in specific manners (Sommers & Sommers, 2010). He accepted rather that character was a settled condition we are in when we are wealthy comparable to our sentiments and our activities. The temperances of character are miens to act with a specific goal in mind because of comparable circumstances. Great lead emerges from propensities that thusly must be gained by rehashed activity and revision. Col. Robert Gould Shaw fits Aristotle’s perspective on Character best as I would like to think. He was not just the officer of the 54th Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry, their voice. The people of color that battled with Shaw were slaves that needed to battle for their opportunity. At the point when Shaw was recounted the United States Government wanting to frame this regiment of dark fighters he consented to take the Commanding position. He at that point asked his closest companion Major Cabot Forbes to battle alongside him and Forbes acknowledged. At a certain point Shaw battles for these men to get the best possible uniform and boots. He additionally rejects pay alongside them subsequent to discovering that they are paid not exactly the white warriors. Both Shaw and Forbes firmly associated with this gathering of men: the furious Private Trip (Denzel Washington); Private Jupiter Sharts (Jhine Kennedy); Corporal Thomas Searles (Andre Braugher), a shrewd and instructed man that grew up with Shaw and worked for Shaw’s father, and Sgt. Maj. John Rawlins (Morgan Freeman), a runaway slave who talks with the voice of shrewdness and reason. Nobility is the condition of nature of being deserving of respect or regard. Aristotle’s see on poise comprises of the awareness that we merit respects, not in preparing them. You can't win pride through outer honors; rather it is something you offer to yourself. â€Å"Dignity comprises not in having acknowledgment from others, however in awareness that we merit acknowledgment from others† (Sommers &Sommers, 2010). The character played by Morgan Freeman, Rawlings, realized that being a slave was not worth a lot, so he chose to assist Shaw with taking on the conflict at Fort Wagner. Forbes likewise showed pride in the film. Forbes was Col. Shaw’s closest companion and is who told Col. Shaw of this regiment. Because of the sort of relationship the two had, Col. Shaw asked Forbes to join him to set up the dark slaves. Forbes concurred and remained by Col. Shaw and these individuals of color through the ridiculing, getting the best possible shoes, and accepting their outfits like the white troopers had while battling in the Civil War. Aristotle portrays the situation of character, nobility and sense of pride as character being a state worry with decision, lying in a mean comparative with us, this is dictated by reason and so that a man of knowledge would decide it. It is a mean between two indecencies that relies upon abundance that relies upon imperfection (Sommers & Sommers, 2010) Aristotle feels neither an inclination nor a limit nor a propensity to carry on in explicit manners. It is the settled condition we are in when we are wealthy in a connection to our emotions and activities when we are in a mean or middle of the road state as to them. Which means we have an awful character that we are gravely off comparable to feeling and activities, and we bomb the methods with respect to them. The character that I felt demonstrated this kind of job would be Denzel and Andre’s characters, known as Trip and Thomas. Outing was a runaway slave that was furious. He didn’t have anyone and had been recently beaten a few times. Outing had explicit contemplations of the white man and they were that the slaves were viewed as monkeys. He felt that the slaves ought to be spruced up in uniform and battle, since the white men would just get themselves slaughtered and wouldn’t have the option to win. Andre Braugher played Thomas. He was an informed man that had worked for Col. Shaw’s father. He accepted that individuals of color should realize how to peruse and encapsulate pride. In the film Glory, Thomas had figured out how to take a great deal. Thomas expected that since he and Col. Shaw were dear companions that he would be dealt with a piece in an unexpected way, yet incredibly, he was gotten out by his closest companion to prepare significantly quicker than he was and afterward shouted at. Thomas learned much toward the finish of the film, including dignity. Thomas had been shot in a past fight and he asked Col. Shaw to guarantee that he wouldn’t send him back, which Shaw didn’t permit Thomas to proceed in fight. Later in the film, Col. Shaw asks who would substitute the spot of the flagman, should something occur, and Thomas expressed that he would and did. Epictetus held the Orthodox Stoic view that everything known to mankind is coordinated by awesome will. Epictetus was not quite the same as the early stoics in that he accepted joy was found in keeping up one’s good character rather than making progress toward moral greatness. He stressed self-information and keeping one’s good character all together as the best approach to accomplish a glad life. Epictetus cautioned his understudies to expect oppression since their activities and mentalities would be not quite the same as people around them. He urged them to see life as an athletic test, a celebration or a short military help, where achievement would originate from a mix of right decisions and expertise. Epictetus accepted that â€Å"grief was the most hostile feeling; he thought about the enduring of distress as a demonstration of shrewdness. It was a hardheaded demonstration, conflicting with the desire of God to have all men share happiness† (Stockdale, 1995). Col. Robert Shaw, through his self-awareness and interior acknowledge satisfied his administration obligations on the war zone, just as past. He decided to take the convictions he had from his life preceding war to another level. Shaw battled with the subject of equity among the races yet he perceived the character and wants of the Black Americans and decided to follow up for their sake just as the Unions. Shaw felt that his officers, paying little mind to shading, merited regard the same amount of as the white warriors. Shaw was ready to not take pay to make a point that his troopers merited a similar compensation as their individual white fighters. He adhered his neck out to ensure they got the best possible apparatus so as to battle. Shaw had at long last chosen to not let the sadness from the earlier fight to control him, he decided to help in the bliss of the slaves and keep on battling for their opportunity. Holy person Augustine Augustine’s approach was not simply splendid, it was commonsense. His understanding is mentally valid and genuinely fulfilling in that it gives expectation and offers importance to the Christian attempting to bode well out of life in a fallen world (Sommers & Sommers, 2010). To Augustine, anything that had being was acceptable. Great as the ground of being was entirely acceptable, alongside all that he brought into being. This integrity was a property that came in shifting degrees. The deterrents that Col. Robert Gould Shaw needed to defeat is the way that he fizzled in fight some other time. He needed to pick himself back up, and he at that point drove the dark regiment in the Civil War and was would not leave these dark warriors alone rewarded with any less regard than the white officers. Another difficulty that Col. Shaw and his dark fighters needed to suffer was the reality they were getting come up short on, they were not given the best possible shoes to walk in, and the reality they were not given the best possible outfits like different officers. Col. Shaw had indicated an existence of character, pride and sense of pride by being the fair Commander that he was. Col. Shaw never let others sees hinder his own perspective on his troopers. Col. Shaw had sense of pride despite the fact that he had been vanquished, before driving the 54th Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry troopers with respect and never abandoned them. He was a man that trusted in confidence and that the dark officers were the same than any others.